Cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients by using left bundle branch pacing

Ying Gu; Yanming Li; Ying Zhu; Xiuyu Lin; Tian Tian; Qigao Zhang; Jianbin Gong; Lei Wang; Jianhua Li

doi:10.3389/fcvm.2022.990016

Cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients by using left bundle branch pacing

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Aug 23:9:990016. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.990016. eCollection 2022.

Authors

Ying Gu¹, Yanming Li¹, Ying Zhu¹, Xiuyu Lin², Tian Tian², Qigao Zhang¹, Jianbin Gong¹, Lei Wang¹, Jianhua Li¹

Affiliations

¹ Department of Cardiology, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, China.
² Department of Ultrasonic Diagnosis, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, China.

Abstract

Background: Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is emerging as an effective alternative to achieve cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and improve heart function. The purpose of our study was to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of LBBP in heart failure patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50% and left bundle branch block (LBBB).

Methods: All patients with complete LBBB and LVEF <50% were retrospectively included in the study from April 2018 to April 2021 and underwent CRT via LBBP implantation. ECG, pacing parameters, the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, echocardiographic measurements, and complications were recorded and analyzed at implant and during follow-up of 1, 6, and 12 months.

Results: Left bundle branch pacing was successful in all 34 patients (mean age 65.6 ± 11.2 years, 67.6% men). A significant decrease in QRS duration (QRSd) was observed after the LBBP operation for 1 month (153.2 ± 1.7 vs. 111.9 ± 2.6 ms, p < 0.01). LBB capture threshold and R-wave amplitude remained stable at 12-month follow-up when compared with implantation values (0.62 ± 0.13 V @ 0.4 ms vs. 0.73 ± 0.21 V @ 0.4 ms, 12.02 ± 5.68 mV vs. 8.58 ± 4.09 mV, respectively). LVEF increased significantly (35.28 ± 1.70% vs. 51.09 ± 1.71%, p < 0.01) accompanied with reduced left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDd; 65.3 ± 1.99 vs. 53.58 ± 2.07 mm, p < 0.01) and left atrial dimension (LAD; 49.03 ± 1.32 vs. 40.67 ± 1.58 mm, p < 0.01). Normalized LVEF (LVEF ≥ 50%) was found in 70.5% of patients at 12 months. The NYHA classification, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and 6-minute walk test (6MWT) were significantly improved at follow-up of 12 months (all p < 0.01 vs. baseline). No deaths or heart failure hospitalizations were observed during the follow-up period.

Conclusion: The current work suggested that LBBP was feasible with a high success implantation rate and effective to correct LBBB and improved left ventricular structure and function with a low and stable pacing threshold.

Keywords: cardiac resynchronization therapy; heart failure; left bundle branch block; left bundle branch pacing; pacing threshold.