Trends and correlates of intimate partner violence (IPV) victimization in Rwanda: results from the 2015 and 2020 Rwanda Demographic Health Survey (RDHS 2015 and 2020)

BMC Womens Health. 2022 Sep 6;22(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01951-3.

Abstract

Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is reported to be a public health issue given its magnitude and long-lasting consequences. Men are generally thought to be perpetrators of IPV, but they can also be victims. In Rwanda, the experience of men as victims has not yet been described and characterized. The aim of this study is to examine the trends and correlates of IPV victimization for men and women in Rwanda.

Methods: The data for this study were extracted from the Rwanda Demographic and Health Survey (RDHS) in 2014/15 (female: n = 8292, male: n = 3470) and 2019/2020 (female = 8574, male: n = 3590). The survey had used a structured measure of IPV (i.e. physical, sexual, or emotional) and its related demographic characteristics to collect data in a nationally representative sample of ever-married women aged 15-49 years and men aged 15-59 years. Multiple logistic regression was applied to examine the association between demographic characteristics and IPV in both women and men.

Result: The prevalence of IPV among women increased from 40% in 2015 to 46% in 2020, while it decreased from 21 to 18% in men during the same time period. The associated factors for women IPV victimization in 2015 were: uneducated husband (Adjusted Odds Ratios (AOR) = 5.570, 95% CI 1.29-24.02), woman from the poorest household (AOR = 2.834, 95% CI 1.9-93.12), husband aged from 30 to 39 years (AOR = 2.797, 95% CI 1.517-5.158), husband consuming alcohol (AOR = 3.021, 95% CI 1.517-5.158); women involved in decisions about their own earnings (AOR = 0.576, 95% CI 0.37-0.88); and purchases (AOR = 0.472, 95% CI 0.27-0.82). However, the factors such as uneducated husbands (AOR = 3.032, 95% CI 1.117-8.24); husbands consuming alcohol (AOR = 1.712, 95% CI 2.408-4.486); a woman's involvement in decisions on her personal health (AOR = 0.443, 95% CI 0.30-0.63) and visits from her family or relatives (AOR = 0.405, 95% = 0.41-0.22) were factors of IPV in 2020. On the other hand, the associated factors for men IPV victimization in 2015 were being from richer wealth index (AOR = 0.21, 95% CI 0.04-1.04), frequency of being hit in last 12 months by other than partner (AOR = 5.49, 95% CI 1.65-18.25), woman often consuming alcohol (AOR = 13.30, 95% CI 1.9-93.12); whereas its associated factor in 2020 were women consuming alcohol (3.91, 95% CI 0.55-9.87).

Conclusion: The present study revealed a significant increase in IPV against women, and slight decrease of IPV against men in Rwanda from 2015 to 2020, as well as its associated risks and protective factors over time. This increase needs further exploration given that government and partners have invested in policies and strategies to mitigate the IPV with limited impact. Since there is a relationship between IPV prevalence and education, the existing laws on domestic violence need to be known by the citizens. Findings from this study evidenced also visits from extended families to be a protective factor and therefore suggesting the necessity of a family and community-based approach in managing IPV in Rwanda. Future studies to assess the effectiveness of community-based approach in preventing IPV.

Keywords: DHS; Intimate partner violence; Rwanda; Violence victimization.

MeSH terms

  • Crime Victims*
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Family Characteristics
  • Female
  • Health Surveys
  • Humans
  • Intimate Partner Violence*
  • Male
  • Prevalence
  • Risk Factors
  • Rwanda / epidemiology
  • Sexual Partners / psychology