Extra-Anatomic Bypass and Excision is Superior to Graft Salvage Attempts with Antibiotic Beads to Treat Vascular Graft Infections in the Groin

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to determine if conventional extra-anatomic bypass and graft removal versus aggressive attempts at graft preservation have better survival and limb salvage in patients with localized groin wound infections of vascular grafts.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 53 consecutive patients with vascular graft infections presenting in the groin. Treatment groups consisted of group 1 (extra-anatomic bypass and graft excision, n = 22) and group 2 (initial graft preservation attempts with utilization of antibiotic beads, n = 31). In group 2, patients underwent serial debridement and placement of antibiotic beads until culture-negative wounds were achieved. Significantly more patients underwent muscle flap coverage in group 2 (27/31) compared with group 1 (7/22; P < 0.001). Data collected included demographics, comorbidities, intraoperative details, and outcomes, including patency, limb salvage, mortality, and number of procedures. Continuous variables were examined with Student's t-test, and dichotomous variables were examined with chi-squared test. Linear and logistic regressions were used to analyze factors associated with outcomes, in addition to Kaplan-Meier analysis with log rank for actuarial analysis.

Results: Both groups were similar with respect to demographics. The overall Kaplan-Meier 1- and 3-year survival rates were 66.2% and 34.1%, with no statistically significant difference between groups. The Kaplan-Meier 1- and 3-year limb salvage rates were 68.8% and 36.6% for group 1 vs. 58.5% and 38.7% for group 2 (P = not significant [NS]). The 1- and 3-year primary patency rates were 71% and 71% in traditional group 1 vs. 72% and 56% in group 2 (P = NS). One-year and 3-year secondary patency rates in traditional group 1 were 83% and 71% vs. 85% and 61% in group 2 (P = NS). Patients in group 1 underwent fewer total procedures when compared with group 2 (2.3 ± 0.2 vs. 5.1 ± 0.7, P = 0.03). The late reinfection rate was significantly less in group 1 (4.5%) compared with group 2 (26%; P = 0.04). Freedom from reinfection at 1 and 3 years were 94% and 94% in traditional group 1 vs. 74% and 62% in group 2 (P = 0.03). Multivariable analysis showed a higher incidence of amputation in patients who suffered reinfection (n = 13, P = 0.049). There was a higher mortality in patients with septic shock (n = 10, P = 0.007) and reinfection (n = 13, P = 0.036). Reinfection was associated with the highest mortality (P = 0.03).

Conclusions: Conventional graft excision with extra-anatomic bypass resulted in similar mortality when compared with aggressive attempts at graft preservation and trended toward improved limb salvage and patency. However, attempts at graft preservation with antibiotic beads resulted in a significantly higher reinfection rate and greater number of procedures, and therefore, this approach should be used very selectively.