Eribulin Treatment for Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: The UK Experience - A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Oncology. 2022;100(12):666-673. doi: 10.1159/000526140. Epub 2022 Aug 31.

Abstract

Introduction: This study examined real-world data from patients who received eribulin for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) collected from 14 hospitals across the UK.

Methods: Anonymized data were collected retrospectively from patients with MBC who had received eribulin. The data included the hormone-receptor status, histological diagnosis, age, prior chemotherapy, response to eribulin, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results: Among 577 patients analyzed, the median age was 56 years, and most patients (73%) were estrogen-receptor positive. The median OS was 288 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 261-315), and the PFS was 117 days (95% CI: 105-129). The median OS was higher among older patients (≥65 vs. <65 years: 325 days [95% CI: 264-385] vs. 285 days [95% CI: 252-317]; p = 0.028). The median OS was also higher in patients who received eribulin after fewer prior lines of chemotherapy (≤2 vs. >2 prior: 328 days [95% CI: 264-385] vs. 264 days [95% CI: 229-298]; p = 0.042).

Discussion/conclusion: These retrospective data suggest that eribulin can be successfully used in older patients with MBC. Eribulin treatment was more effective in earlier-line settings, which, while predictable, supports consideration of eribulin as a second-line treatment option.

Keywords: Eribulin; Metastatic breast cancer; Observation study; Older adults; Real-world data; Second-line treatment.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Breast Neoplasms* / pathology
  • Female
  • Furans / therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Ketones / therapeutic use
  • Middle Aged
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome
  • United Kingdom

Substances

  • eribulin
  • Furans
  • Ketones

Grants and funding

Eisai Company Limited provided financial assistance for the statistical analysis of the data. Writing support was provided by Oxford PharmaGenesis Inc., Newtown, PA, USA and was funded by Eisai Inc., Nutley, NJ, USA. Role of the funding source: Eisai Company Limited provided financial assistance for the statistical analysis of the data. They were not involved in the study design/conception, development, analysis of data, or the writing of the manuscript. The authors had full access to the data and control of the final approval and decision to submit the manuscript.