Protective measures against Omicron could be more effective than Evusheld® in liver transplant recipients

Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2022 Dec;114(12):769-770. doi: 10.17235/reed.2022.9058/2022.

Abstract

Evusheld (the combination of cilgavimab and tixagevimab, two long-lasting monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2) has been approved by the FDA as a pre-exposure treatment for COVID-19 in immunocompromised patients older than 12 years. However, this monoclonal antibody has been developed from SARS-CoV-2 variants that were predominant at the beginning of the pandemic, when Ómicron was not prevalent. Compared with other solid organ transplant recipients, liver transplant recipients have shown an excellent immune response to standard vaccination with three doses of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. In addition, this population has shown very good adherence to protective measures for the transmission of COVID-19 infection. Several studies have shown that the use of Evusheld is less effective against Ómicron than against other variants of SARS-CoV-2. In addition, in the post-hoc analysis, it appears to be a drug that increases cardiovascular risk. For these reasons, we believe that in liver transplant recipients is essential to prioritize vaccination and protective measures, rather than the use of Evusheld as pre-exposure prophylaxis.

MeSH terms

  • COVID-19 Vaccines
  • COVID-19*
  • Humans
  • Liver Transplantation*
  • SARS-CoV-2

Substances

  • cilgavimab and tixagevimab drug combination
  • COVID-19 Vaccines

Supplementary concepts

  • SARS-CoV-2 variants