Modeling for Insights: Does Fiscal Decentralization Impede Ecological Footprint?

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 16;19(16):10146. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610146.

Abstract

In recent years, the debate on environmental issues has become a hot topic. Fiscal decentralization is believed to be a crucial driver of environmental sustainability. However, the discussion on the effect of fiscal decentralization (FD) on environmental sustainability has not reached a unanimous conclusion. In this study, we inspect the effect of fiscal decentralization, economic development, technological innovation, economic globalization, and energy use on environmental quality in eight Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) member countries. In addition, we analyze the mechanisms through which fiscal decentralization influences the ecological footprint (EF) through the channels of technological innovation and economic growth. Using the STIRPAT framework, this study employed the CS-ARDL method for short-run and long-run analyses that deal with slope heterogeneity and cross-sectional dependence. The empirical results show that fiscal decentralization and technological innovation mitigate ecological footprint, while economic development, energy consumption, and urbanization negatively affect environmental quality. However, economic globalization is not related to the EF in the sample economies. The results further reveal that FD enhances environmental quality through the channel of technological innovation, while it does not affect the EF through the channel of economic growth. Finally, it is recommended to make a reasoned division between the rights and responsibilities of local government and central government in environmental pollution management, and optimize the environmental system. At the same time, policymakers should encourage technological innovation to reduce the adverse impacts of economic development and energy consumption on the environment.

Keywords: ecological footprint; economic globalization; economic growth; fiscal decentralization; technological innovation.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Carbon Dioxide / analysis
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Economic Development*
  • Internationality
  • Politics
  • Urbanization*

Substances

  • Carbon Dioxide

Grants and funding

This research was funded by National Social Science Foundation of China (grant number 20BJY031; 21BJY077); Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation Project (ZR2019MG034). The correspondence author is supported by the Fundamental Research Start-up Funds from Shandong University of Technology (Project No. 4033/721020).