The Reduction in Medical Errors on Implementing an Intensive Care Information System in a Setting Where a Hospital Electronic Medical Record System is Already in Use: Retrospective Analysis

Yusuke Seino; Nobuo Sato; Masafumi Idei; Takeshi Nomura

doi:10.2196/39782

The Reduction in Medical Errors on Implementing an Intensive Care Information System in a Setting Where a Hospital Electronic Medical Record System is Already in Use: Retrospective Analysis

JMIR Perioper Med. 2022 Aug 31;5(1):e39782. doi: 10.2196/39782.

Authors

Yusuke Seino¹, Nobuo Sato¹, Masafumi Idei^{1

2}, Takeshi Nomura¹

Affiliations

¹ Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
² Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan.

PMID: 35964333
PMCID: PMC9475405
DOI: 10.2196/39782

Abstract

Background: Although the various advantages of clinical information systems in intensive care units (ICUs), such as intensive care information systems (ICISs), have been reported, their role in preventing medical errors remains unclear.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the changes in the incidence and type of errors in the ICU before and after ICIS implementation in a setting where a hospital electronic medical record system is already in use.

Methods: An ICIS was introduced to the general ICU of a university hospital. After a step-by-step implementation lasting 3 months, the ICIS was used for all patients starting from April 2019. We performed a retrospective analysis of the errors in the ICU during the 6-month period before and after ICIS implementation by using data from an incident reporting system, and the number, incidence rate, type, and patient outcome level of errors were determined.

Results: From April 2018 to September 2018, 755 patients were admitted to the ICU, and 719 patients were admitted from April 2019 to September 2019. The number of errors was 153 in the 2018 study period and 71 in the 2019 study period. The error incidence rates in 2018 and 2019 were 54.1 (95% CI 45.9-63.4) and 27.3 (95% CI 21.3-34.4) events per 1000 patient-days, respectively (P<.001). During both periods, there were no significant changes in the composition of the types of errors (P=.16), and the most common type of error was medication error.

Conclusions: ICIS implementation was temporally associated with a 50% reduction in the number and incidence rate of errors in the ICU. Although the most common type of error was medication error in both study periods, ICIS implementation significantly reduced the number and incidence rate of medication errors.

Trial registration: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000041471; https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000047345.

Keywords: clinical information system; electronic medical record; intensive care unit; medical error.

©Yusuke Seino, Nobuo Sato, Masafumi Idei, Takeshi Nomura. Originally published in JMIR Perioperative Medicine (http://periop.jmir.org), 31.08.2022.