The Role of Novel Bladder Cancer Diagnostic and Surveillance Biomarkers-What Should a Urologist Really Know?

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 5;19(15):9648. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159648.

Abstract

The aim of this review is to analyze and describe the current landscape of bladder cancer diagnostic and surveillance biomarkers. We researched the literature from 2016 to November 2021 to find the most promising new molecules and divided them into seven different subgroups based on their function and location in the cell. Although cystoscopy and cytology are still the gold standard for diagnosis and surveillance when it comes to bladder cancer (BCa), their cost is quite a burden for national health systems worldwide. Currently, the research is focused on finding a biomarker that has high negative predictive value (NPV) and can exclude with a certainty the presence of the tumor, considering missing it could be disastrous for the patient. Every subgroup has its own advantages and disadvantages; for example, protein biomarkers cost less than genomic ones, but on the other hand, they seem to be less precise. We tried to simplify this complicated topic as much as possible in order to make it comprehensible to doctors and urologists that are not as familiar with it, as well as encourage them to actively participate in ongoing research.

Keywords: biomarkers; bladder cancer; diagnosis; surveillance.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Biomarkers, Tumor / analysis
  • Cystoscopy
  • Humans
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Urinary Bladder Neoplasms* / diagnosis
  • Urologists

Substances

  • Biomarkers, Tumor

Grants and funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship and publication of this article.