Hesitant 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic multi-criteria decision-making method based on correlation measures

PLoS One. 2022 Aug 9;17(8):e0270414. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270414. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Correlation is considered the most important factor in analyzing the data in statistics. It is used to measure the movement of two different variables linearly. The concept of correlation is well-known and used in different fields to measure the association between two variables. The hesitant 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic set (H2FLS) comes out to be valuable in addressing people's reluctant subjective data. The purpose of this paper is to analyze new correlation measures between H2FLSs and apply them in the decision-making process. First and foremost, the ideas of mean and variance of hesitant 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic elements (H2FLEs) are introduced. Then, a new correlation coefficient between H2FLSs is established. In addition, considering that different H2FLEs may have different criteria weights, the weighted correlation coefficient and ordered weighted correlation coefficient are further investigated. A practical example concerning the detailed procedure of solving problems is exemplified to feature the reasonableness and attainability of the proposed technique in situations where the criteria weights are either known or unknown. When the weight vector is unknown, the best-worst method (BWM) is used to acquire the criteria weights in the context of a hesitant 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic environment. Furthermore, a comparative study is undertaken with current techniques to provide a vision into the design decision-making process. Finally, it is verified that the proposed correlation coefficient between H2FLSs is more satisfactory than the extant ones, and the correlation coefficient with the weights of criteria being either known or unknown is applicable.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Decision Making*
  • Fuzzy Logic*
  • Humans
  • Linguistics

Grants and funding

The work was supported by the National Science Centre, Decision number UMO-2018/29/B/HS4/ 02725 (WS). The National Science Centre had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.