Objective: To compare the number of surge events and efficacy of phacoemulsification using a near-physiological intraocular pressure (IOP) setting and a standard IOP setting. Materials and methods: The surgical data of patients who underwent phacoemulsification with IOL implantation using the CENTURION Vision System's Active Fluidics setting and Active Sentry Handpiece (Alcon Laboratories, USA) were analyzed. Results: The study included 181 patients (204 eyes). In Group 1, the IOP was set at 20 mmHg (n=102, 50%), and in Group 2, the IOP was set at 60 mmHg (n=102, 50%). Total case time was significantly lower (p=.036) in Group 1 (0:03:17.20 ± 0:00:34.55 vs. 0:03:28.71 ± 0:00:43.03). There was no statistically significant difference between the mean cumulative dissipated energy (CDE) (7.06 ± 3.20 vs. 7.59 ± 3.26) and mean ultrasound (UJS) time (0:00:36 ± 0:00:12 vs. 0:00:38 ± 0:00:13) between the two groups (p=0.24 and p=0.31, respectively). Active sentry (AS) engaged less often (p<0.001) in Group 1. There was no statistically significant correlation between the CDE and AS activation in Group 1 (p=0.96). A strong statistically significant correlation between the CDE and AS activation (p<0.0001, r=0.61, CI (0.47 to 0.72)) was observed in group 2. Conclusion: During phacoemulsification, surge events are more likely to occur when operating at high IOP settings. Abbreviations: LIPMICS = low infusion pressure microincision cataract surgery, IOP = intraocular pressure, CDE = cumulative dissipated energy, UJS = mean ultrasound time, AS = Active sentry, LOCS = Lens Opacities Classification System, NO = nuclear opalescence, AFR = aspiration flow rate.
Keywords: phaco fluidics; phacoemulsification; postocclusion break; surge; target intraocular pressure.
© The Authors.Romanian Society of Ophthalmology.