Analysis of the Volumetric Asymmetry of the Mandibular Condyles Using CBCT

Int Dent J. 2022 Dec;72(6):797-804. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2022.06.019. Epub 2022 Aug 2.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyse volumetric asymmetries between the right and left condyles in relation to age, gender, and dental status.

Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis of 150 cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans was conducted. A single investigator performed the volumetric analysis of the CBCT scans using Vesalius 3D software. The volumetric data were analysed in relation to the gender, age, and dental status.

Results: The mean right condylar volume was significantly higher (P < .01) than the left condylar volume. Right and left condylar volumes were significantly higher (P < .01) in male study participants when compared to female study participants. There was no significant difference (P = .47) in the volumetric asymmetry between the male and female study participants. The volumetric asymmetry was significantly higher (P < .01) in the older age groups when compared to the younger age groups. The volumetric asymmetry was significantly higher (P < .01) in the partially and completely edentulous patients when compared to the dentate study participants. The condylar volume on the side having a partially edentulous area was significantly lower than the condylar volume of the contralateral dentate side (P < .001).

Conclusions: The volumetric asymmetry between the right and left condyle significantly increases with age and edentulousness. The result of the study encourages the clinicians to perform volumetric evaluation of the condyles in cases of radiographically evident condylar asymmetries to obtain a more accurate diagnosis.

Keywords: Age; Edentulous; Gender; Mandibular condyle; Segmentation; Volume.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Cone-Beam Computed Tomography* / methods
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Imaging, Three-Dimensional / methods
  • Male
  • Mandibular Condyle* / diagnostic imaging
  • Mouth, Edentulous*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Spiral Cone-Beam Computed Tomography*