Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of motivational interviewing (MI) for COPD in behavioral changes and health outcomes, and also verify the reliability of results in conjunction with trial sequential analysis and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool.
Methods: Studies that implemented MI interventions for COPD patients were systematically searched by eight databases from inception to December 2021. Study screening, quality assessment, data extraction, and meta-analysis were conducted according to Cochrane standards.
Results: Twenty-one studies involving 2344 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses indicated that MI made significant improvement in self-efficacy, lung function, quality of life, emotion, and COPD-related admission, but not in self-management and exercise capacity. Subgroup analyses found that the intervention duration was inversely associated with effect size for both self-efficacy and negative emotion severity. The trial sequential analysis showed MI improved patients' lung function and reduced COPD-related hospitalization with certainty, but the findings for exercise capacity need to be confirmed by further research.
Conclusions: This systematic review suggested the positive effects of MI on self-efficacy, lung function, quality of life, emotion and COPD-related hospitalization. To make a firm conclusion, more well-designed clinical trials with bigger sample sizes required.
Practice implications: Clinical and community nurses can use MI for COPD to increase healthy behaviors.
Trial registration: CRD42021278674.
Keywords: COPD; Effectiveness; Meta-analysis; Motivational interviewing; Trial sequential analysis.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.