Immediate Catheter Drainage Versus Delayed Drainage in the Management of Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis

Wahidullah Dost; Farzad Qasemi; Wahida Ali; Tahmina Aini; Mohammad Qaher Rasully; Jamaluddin Niazi; Rana Sarhadi Jamal; Maseha Sayer; Laila Tul Qadar; Sultan Masoud Shah Afzali

doi:10.7759/cureus.26485

Immediate Catheter Drainage Versus Delayed Drainage in the Management of Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis

Cureus. 2022 Jul 1;14(7):e26485. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26485. eCollection 2022 Jul.

Affiliations

¹ General Surgery, Liaquatian Academic & Research Society, Hyderabad, PAK.
² Cardiovascular Surgery, Punjab Institute of Cardiology, Lahore, PAK.
³ Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, PAK.

Abstract

Background: Immediate or delayed catheter drainage of infected pancreatic necrosis remains a subject of debate. The present study aimed to evaluate the optimum timing for drainage in patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis. Methods: A prospective, observational study was undertaken at the Department of Surgery, Liaquat University of Medical & Health Sciences (LUMHS), between 1st March 2018 and 6th July 2020. All patients 18 years or older presenting with acute pancreatitis (AP) in whom necrotizing pancreatitis was confirmed or suspected were enrolled in the study. The exclusion criteria included prior intervention for necrotizing pancreatitis. Those who were diagnosed with infected necrotizing pancreatitis were labeled as Group A and Group B. Group A patients underwent immediate catheter drainage (within 24 h of admission) while Group B patients underwent delayed drainage (after 24 h). Clinical outcome variables including complication rate, mortality, length of hospital, and intensive care unit (ICU) stay were collected in a predefined pro forma.

Results: One hundred and thirty patients were enrolled in the study. There were 65 patients in each group. The present study revealed no significant differences in patient outcomes in the immediate drainage group vs. the postponed drainage group. Overall, the mortality rate was 15.38% in Group A while the mortality rate was a little lower in Group B, i.e. 10.77% (p=0.44). The acute onset multiple organ failure was lower in Group A as compared to Group B, however, the difference was statistically insignificant (p=0.08). The rate of wound infection rate was 10.77% and 15.38% in Group A and Group B, respectively (p=0.61).

Conclusion: In the present study, we failed to find any significant difference between the immediate and postponed drainage group in terms of patient outcome. As per current findings, the timing of drainage did not impact the prognosis of patients with necrotizing pancreatitis.

Keywords: acute pancreatitis; delayed; drainage; immediate drainage; necrotizing pancreatitis.