Optimization of tissue adhesive curing time for surgical wound closure

Bone Jt Open. 2022 Aug;3(8):607-610. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.38.BJO-2022-0050.R1.

Abstract

Aims: Tissue adhesives (TAs) are a commonly used adjunct to traditional surgical wound closures. However, TAs must be allowed to dry before application of a surgical dressing, increasing operating time and reducing intraoperative efficiency. The goal of this study is to identify a practical method for decreasing the curing time for TAs.

Methods: Six techniques were tested to determine which one resulted in the quickest drying time for 2-octyle cyanoacrylate (Dermabond) skin adhesive. These were nothing (control), fanning with a hand (Fanning), covering with a hand (Covering), bringing operating room lights close (OR Lights), ultraviolet lights (UV Light), or prewarming the TA applicator in a hot water bath (Hot Water Bath). Equal amounts of TA were applied to a reproducible plexiglass surface and allowed to dry while undergoing one of the six techniques. The time to complete dryness was recorded for ten specimens for each of the six techniques.

Results: Use of the Covering, OR Lights, and Hot Water Bath techniques were associated with a 25- (p = 0.042), 27- (p = 0.023), and 30-second (p = 0.009) reduction in drying time, respectively, when compared to controls. The UV Light (p = 0.404) and Fanning (p = 1.000) methods had no effect on drying time.

Conclusion: Use of the Covering, OR Lights, and Hot Water Bath techniques present a means for reducing overall operating time for surgeons using TA for closure augmentation, which can increase intraoperative efficiency. Further studies are needed to validate this in vivo.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(8):607-610.

Keywords: 2-octyl cyanoacrylate; Adhesive; Curing; Drying; Efficiency; Optimization; Tissue adhesive; augmentation; orthopaedic surgery; polymerization; spine surgery; surgical wounds; total hip and knee arthroplasty; variance; wound closure; wounds.