Re-Irradiation for Recurrent Cervical Cancer: A State-of-the-Art Review

Curr Oncol. 2022 Jul 25;29(8):5262-5277. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29080418.

Abstract

The recurrence rate of cervical cancer after primary treatment can reach 60%, and a poor prognosis is reported in most cases. Treatment options for the recurrence of cervical cancer mainly depend on the prior treatment regimen and the location of recurrent lesions. Re-irradiation is still considered as a clinical challenge, owing to a high incidence of toxicity, especially in in-field recurrence within a short period of time. Recent advances in radiotherapy have preliminarily revealed encouraging outcomes of re-irradiation. Several centers have concentrasted on stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the treatment of well-selected cases. Meanwhile, as the image-guiding techniques become more precise, a better dose profile can also be achieved in brachytherapy, including high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT) and permanent radioactive seed implantation (PRSI). These treatment modalities have shown promising efficacy with a tolerable toxicity, providing further treatment options for recurrent cervical cancer. However, it is highly unlikely to draw a definite conclusion from all of those studies due to the large heterogeneity among them and the lack of large-scale prospective studies. This study mainly reviews and summarizes the progress of re-irradiation for recurrent cervical cancer in recent years, in order to provide potential treatment regimens for the management of re-irradiation.

Keywords: high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy; permanent radioactive seed implantation; re-irradiation; recurrent cervical cancer; stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Brachytherapy*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Prospective Studies
  • Radiosurgery* / methods
  • Re-Irradiation* / methods
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms* / pathology
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms* / radiotherapy

Grants and funding

This research received no external funding.