Reply to Jan T. Lifjeld et al.: Female agency and fitness benefits of mixed-paternity broods remain
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
.
2022 Jul 26;119(30):e2207741119.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2207741119.
Epub 2022 Jul 6.
Authors
Sigrunn Eliassen
1
,
Tatjana Krama
2
3
,
Severi Luoto
4
,
Ronalds Krams
2
3
,
Adèle Mennerat
1
5
,
Priit Jõers
6
,
Didzis Elferts
7
,
Markus J Rantala
8
,
Indrikis A Krams
9
10
Affiliations
1
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, Bergen 5020, Norway.
2
Department of Biotechnology, Daugavpils University, Daugavpils 5401, Latvia.
3
Plant Health, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu 51006, Estonia.
4
School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.
5
Écologie et Dynamique des Systèmes Anthropisés, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, CNRS, Amiens 80039, France.
6
Department of General and Microbial Biochemistry, University of Tartu, Tartu 51010, Estonia.
7
Department of Botany and Ecology, Faculty of Biology, University of Latvia, Riga 1004, Latvia.
8
Department of Biology, Section of Ecology, University of Turku, Turku 20014, Finland.
9
Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology, Faculty of Biology, University of Latvia, Riga 1004, Latvia.
10
Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu 51014, Estonia.
PMID:
35858464
PMCID:
PMC9335182
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.2207741119
No abstract available
Publication types
Letter
Comment
MeSH terms
Animals
Female
Male
Mating Preference, Animal*
Pair Bond*
Paternal Inheritance*
Songbirds*