Purpose of review: Machine learning solutions are being increasingly used in the analysis of neuroimaging (NI) data, and as a result, there is an increase in the emphasis of the reproducibility and replicability of these data-driven solutions. Although this is a very positive trend, related terminology is often not properly defined, and more importantly, (computational) reproducibility that refers to obtaining consistent results using the same data and the same code is often disregarded.
Recent findings: We review the findings of a recent paper on the topic along with other relevant literature, and present two examples that demonstrate the importance of accounting for reproducibility in widely used software for NI data.
Summary: We note that reproducibility should be a first step in all NI data analyses including those focusing on replicability, and introduce available solutions for assessing reproducibility. We add the cautionary remark that when not taken into account, lack of reproducibility can significantly bias all subsequent analysis stages.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.