CIEDE2000 lightness, chroma and hue human gingiva thresholds

María M Pérez; Francisco Carrillo-Perez; Maria Tejada-Casado; Javier Ruiz-López; Cristina Benavides-Reyes; Luis Javier Herrera

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104213

CIEDE2000 lightness, chroma and hue human gingiva thresholds

J Dent. 2022 Sep:124:104213. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104213. Epub 2022 Jul 3.

Authors

María M Pérez¹, Francisco Carrillo-Perez², Maria Tejada-Casado³, Javier Ruiz-López³, Cristina Benavides-Reyes⁴, Luis Javier Herrera⁵

Affiliations

¹ Department of Optics, Faculty of Science, University of Granada, Campus Fuente Nueva, Edificio Mecenas, s/n 18071, ibsGranada, Granada, Spain. Electronic address: mmperez@ugr.es.
² Department of Computer Architecture and Computer Technology, E.T.S.I.I.T., University of Granada, s/n 18071, IBS, Granada, Spain; Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research (BMIR), Stanford University, Medical School Office Building (MSOB), 1265 Welch Rd, Stanford, CA 94305-5479, United States.
³ Department of Optics, Faculty of Science, University of Granada, Campus Fuente Nueva, Edificio Mecenas, s/n 18071, ibsGranada, Granada, Spain.
⁴ Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Dentistry, Colegio Máximo, University of Granada, Campus de Cartuja s/n 18071, Granada, Spain.
⁵ Department of Computer Architecture and Computer Technology, E.T.S.I.I.T., University of Granada, s/n 18071, IBS, Granada, Spain.

PMID: 35793761
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104213

Abstract

Objective: To determine the visual 50:50% perceptibility and acceptability CIEDE2000 lightness, chroma and hue human gingiva thresholds.

Methods: A psychophysical experiment based on visual assessments of simulated images of human gingiva on a calibrated display was performed. A 20-obsever panel (dentists and laypersons; n=10) evaluated three subsets of simulated human gingiva: lightness subset (|ΔL^'/ΔE₀₀|≥ 0.98); chroma subset (|ΔC^'/ΔE₀₀|≥ 0.98) and hue subset (|ΔH^'/ΔE₀₀|≥ 0.96) using ΔE₀₀< 5 units. A Takagi-Sugeno-Kang (TSK) Fuzzy Approximation model was used as fitting procedure, and 50:50% perceptibility threshold (PT) and acceptability threshold (AT) were calculated. Data was statistically analyzed using t-test (p ≤ 0.05).

Results: The 50:50% PT were ΔL' = 0.74 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39-1.09); ΔC' = 1.10 (95% CI 0.57-1.46); ΔH' = 2.40 (95% CI 1.66->3.85). The 50:50% AT were ΔL' = 2.57 (95% CI 2.00-3.06); ΔC' = 2.70 (95% CI 2.19-3.38). AT ΔH' may be considered no computable. PT values were statistically significant among the three metric differences (p ≤ 0.05). No difference was found between observers for PT values.

Conclusions: Statistically differences in perceptual limit were found among hue, lightness and chroma for human gingiva. Thus, the observers seem to show lower sensitivity for changes in hue (ΔH^') than in chroma (ΔC^') and in lightness (ΔL^') in the gingiva color space.

Clinical significance: PT and AT for lightness, chroma and hue specific for human gingiva should be used when evaluating natural gingiva, pink gingival shade guides or pink materials, since the thresholds of perception and acceptability for teeth are not suitable.

Keywords: CIEDE2000; Chroma; Hue; Human gingiva; Lightness; Visual thresholds.

Publication types

Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

Color
Gingiva*
Humans
Tooth*