Effect of the transanal drainage tube on preventing anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Aug;37(8):1739-1750. doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04201-y. Epub 2022 Jul 5.

Abstract

Purpose: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a common postoperative complication of rectal cancer, and transanal drainage tube (TDT) efficacy is still contentious. This study aimed to evaluate the TDT effect on AL prevention.

Methods: All relevant papers were searched by using a predefined search strategy (two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), one prospective study, and four retrospective studies). Meta-analysis was conducted to estimate AL and re-operation pooled rates.

Results: A total of 7 studies (1556 patients) were included: No significant statistic difference was found between two groups on AL rate (odds ratio (OR) 0.61, P = 0.11) and re-operation rate (OR 0.52, P = 0.10). For subgroup analysis, significant statistic difference was found between two groups on AL rate (OR 0.29, P = 0.002) and re-operation rate (OR 0.15, P = 0.04) in patients without neoadjuvant therapy. As for patients without diverting stoma, the AL rate (OR 0.35, P = 0.002) was significantly lower than that in patients without TDT.

Conclusions: TDT may reduce AL morbidity and re-operation rate for patients without high risk of AL, but may be useless for those in high-risk situations.

Keywords: Diverting stoma; Laparoscopic surgery; Rectal cancer; Transanal drainage tube.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Anal Canal / surgery
  • Anastomosis, Surgical / adverse effects
  • Anastomotic Leak / etiology
  • Anastomotic Leak / prevention & control
  • Anastomotic Leak / surgery
  • Drainage / adverse effects
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy* / adverse effects
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Rectal Neoplasms* / complications
  • Retrospective Studies