Minimally Invasive Spine Stabilization for Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis: A 23-Case Series and Review of Literature

Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Jun 1;58(6):754. doi: 10.3390/medicina58060754.

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The incidence of pyogenic spondylodiscitis has been increasing due to the aging of the population. Although surgical treatment is performed for refractory pyogenic spondylodiscitis, surgical invasiveness should be considered. Recent minimally invasive spine stabilization (MISt) using percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) can be a less invasive approach. The purpose of this study was to evaluate surgical results and clinical outcomes after MISt with PPS for pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Materials and Methods: Clinical data of patients who underwent MISt with PPS for pyogenic spondylitis were analyzed. Results: Twenty-three patients (18 male, 5 female, mean age 67.0 years) were retrospectively enrolled. The mean follow-up period was 15.9 months after surgery. The causative organism was identified in 16 cases (69.6%). A mean number of fixed vertebrae was 4.1, and the estimated blood loss was 145.0 mL. MISt with PPS was successfully performed in 19 of 23 patients (82.6%). Four cases (17.4%) required additional anterior debridement and autologous iliac bone graft placement. CRP levels had become negative at an average of 28.4 days after surgery. There was no major perioperative complication and no screw or rod breakages during follow-up. Conclusions: MISt with PPS would be a less invasive approach for pyogenic spondylodiscitis in elderly or immunocompromised patients.

Keywords: minimally invasive spinal treatment (MIST); minimally invasive spine stabilization (MISt); minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS); percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS); pyogenic spondylodiscitis.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Discitis* / surgery
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Lumbar Vertebrae / surgery
  • Male
  • Pedicle Screws*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Spinal Fusion* / methods
  • Treatment Outcome

Grants and funding

This research received no external funding.