The Roles of Mutation and Selection Acting on Mitochondrial Genomes Inferred from Intraspecific Variation in Seed Plants

Genes (Basel). 2022 Jun 9;13(6):1036. doi: 10.3390/genes13061036.

Abstract

There is a paradox in the plant mitochondrial genome, that is, the genic region evolves slowly while the intergenic region evolves rapidly. Thus, the intergenic regions of the plant mitochondrial genome are difficult to align across different species, even in closely related species. Here, to character the mechanism of this paradox, we identified interspecific variations in the Ginkgo biloba, Oryza sativa, and Arabidopsis thaliana mitochondrial and plastid genome at a genome-wide level. The substitution rate of synonymous sites in genic regions was similar to the substitution rate of intergenic regions, while the substitution rate of nonsynonymous sites in genic regions was lower than that in intergenic regions, suggesting the mutation inputs were the same among different categories within the organelle genome, but the selection pressure varied. The substitution rate of single-copy regions was higher than that of IR (inverted repeats) in the plastid genome at an intraspecific level. The substitution rate of single-copy regions was higher than that of repeats in the G. biloba and A. thaliana mitochondrial genomes, but lower in that of O. sativa. This difference may be related to the length and distribution of repeats. Copy number variations that existed in the G. biloba and O. sativa mitochondrial genomes were confirmed. This study reveals the intraspecific variation pattern of organelle genomes at a genome-wide level, and that copy number variations were common in plant mitochondrial genomes.

Keywords: copy number variation; mutation rate; organelle; seed plants; single-nucleotide polymorphisms.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Arabidopsis* / genetics
  • DNA Copy Number Variations
  • DNA, Intergenic
  • Genome, Mitochondrial*
  • Mutation
  • Phylogeny
  • Seeds

Substances

  • DNA, Intergenic

Grants and funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32170238 and 31970244), and the Science, Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality (RCYX20200714114538196).