Background: We compared the safety and effectiveness of left internal mammary artery (LIMA) angiography through right radial (Rad) or femoral (Fem) artery access with a single-catheter technique.
Methods: LIMA selective imaging was attempted through Rad access with a Bartorelli-Cozzi 5.2Fr catheter in 190 consecutive patients. They were compared with 190 consecutive patients in whom LIMA was imaged with a mammary catheter via Fem access. Successful LIMA imaging within 15 min and time needed for imaging were efficacy end-point. Safety metrics were cerebral ischemic events and access site complications.
Results: Overall success rate of Rad LIMA imaging was 62 %. The success rate of Fem LIMA imaging was 97 %. In Rad group, patient age emerged as the single independent correlate of success at multivariate analysis (OR 9.938, CI 0.902-0.977 p = 0.002), with 77 % success rate in the lowest age quartile (<67 years). Median time needed to obtain selective LIMA imaging was significantly longer in Rad than in Fem (5.5 min vs. 4.0 min, p < 0.001), but right radial access was not a significant predictor of time needed to image LIMA at multivariate analysis (K 0.726, CI [-0.130-1.581], p = 0.09). Access site complications (6 vs. 0 cases, p = 0.030), and clinically significant bleeding (4 vs. 0 cases, p = 0.1) occurred in Fem group only. No peri-procedural cerebrovascular events were seen in either Group.
Conclusions: Right radial artery is a suboptimal, yet reasonable access for LIMA-graft selective imaging in younger patients. The technique is free from vascular complications and peri-procedural cerebrovascular events.
Keywords: Bartorelli Cozzi coronary catheter; Left internal mammary artery angiography; Right radial access.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.