Does the network structure of obsessive-compulsive symptoms at treatment admission identify patients at risk for non-response?

Abstract

Exposure and response prevention is the gold-standard treatment for obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), yet up to half of patients do not adequately respond. Thus, different approaches to identifying and intervening with non-responders are badly needed. One approach would be to better understand the functional connections among aspects of OCD symptoms and, ultimately, how to target those associations in treatment. In a large sample of patients who completed intensive treatment for OCD and related disorders (N = 1343), we examined whether differences in network structure of OCD symptom aspects existed at baseline between treatment responders versus non-responders. A network comparison test indicated a significant difference between OCD network structure for responders versus non-responders (M = 0.19, p = .02). Consistent differences emerged between responders and non-responders in how they responded to emotional distress. This pattern of associations suggests that non-responders may have been more reactive to their distress by performing compulsions, thereby worsening their functioning. By examining the association between baseline distress intolerance with other symptom aspects that presumably maintain the disorder (e.g., ritualizing), clinicians can more effectively target those associations in treatment.

Keywords: Distress tolerance; Exposure and response prevention; Network analysis; Treatment refractory; obsessive Compulsive disorder.