Evaluation of the Effects of Repeated Insertion-Removal Cycles on the Retention of an Indexed Conometric Connection

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022 May-Jun;37(3):549-555. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9497.

Abstract

Purpose: The objectives of this in vitro study were to evaluate changes in the retention force of the indexed conometric system subjected to repeated insertion-removal cycles and to examine the elements (matrix and patrix) that cause retention changes in the system as a result of repeated cycles.

Materials and methods: Monolithic zirconia crowns were cemented on 24 matrixes and 24 patrixes fixed on the implant analog. The pull-out test was performed with 12 matrixes and 12 patrixes attached, and the initial retention forces were recorded. Six of them were subjected to five insertion-removal cycles (5-cycle group), and the other six samples to 15 cycles (15-cycle group), and the final retention forces were calculated. Then, in both groups, an element of each pair exposed to the cycle was matched by an exchanging with new pieces: 5 cycles of matrix-new patrix (5M/0P), 5 cycles of patrix-new matrix (5P/0M), 15 cycles of matrix-new patrix (15M/0P), and 15 cycles of patrix-new matrix (15P/0M); thus, subgroups were created. A pull-out test was applied to these subgroups, and retention forces were recorded. Data were subjected to a paired-samples t test (α = .05). Two specimens from the 15-cycle group were randomly selected and analyzed by scanning electron microscopy.

Results: In the 5-cycle group, the mean initial retention force was 153.13 ± 7.08 N, and the mean final retention force was 111.59 ± 18.30 N. In the 15-cycle group, the mean initial retention force was 143.30 ± 15.46 N, and the mean final retention force was 78.55 ± 17.03 N. There was a statistically significant loss of retention in both groups (P < .05). The change in retention in the 5P/0M and 15P/0M subgroups was not statistically significant (P > .05). However, significant loss of retention was found in the 5M/0P and 15M/0P subgroups (P < .05).

Conclusion: There was a significant loss of the retention force after insertion-removal cycles. The increase in these cycles caused a further decrease in retention force. The decrease in the retention force of this system mainly resulted from the changes in the surface characteristic of the frictional surfaces of the matrix.

MeSH terms

  • Crowns
  • Dental Stress Analysis
  • Denture Retention*
  • Denture, Overlay*
  • Materials Testing