Exploring the Experience of Living with and Managing Presbyopia

Optom Vis Sci. 2022 Aug 1;99(8):635-644. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001913. Epub 2022 Jun 9.

Abstract

Significance: Presbyopia typically occurs around 40 years of age and affects approximately one-quarter of the global population. Up to October 2021, there were no approved pharmacotherapies for presbyopia, and common treatments, such as glasses, can have disadvantages for individuals' health-related quality of life.

Purpose: This study aimed to document the experience of living with and managing presbyopia, identify perspectives on treatment options, and determine whether there is an unmet need in the treatment landscape.

Methods: Coded transcripts of concept elicitation (CE; n = 20) and cognitive debriefing (n = 20) interviews with presbyopic individuals, originally conducted for development of patient-reported outcome instruments, were reanalyzed to identify salient concepts describing participants' experiences with presbyopia treatments. Qualitative ranking exercises assessed participants' preferences for a potential pharmacotherapy vs. existing treatments.

Results: Because most concepts were identified with the CE interviews, data reflect CE findings unless otherwise noted. Average age across CE/cognitive debriefing interviews was 49.4 years; a vast majority of participants used glasses for presbyopia treatment. Four themes related to treatment with glasses were identified with the interviews: inconvenience during daily activities, negative physical sensations around the eyes/head, limitations, and undesirable impacts on daily life (e.g., psychosocial). Most commonly, participants reported inconveniences related to forgetting glasses and psychosocial impacts (e.g., feeling/looking older). Strained/tired eyes and limited ability to see at varying distances were also reported. Among participants with near-vision glasses who provided data, two-thirds expressed interest in alternative treatments. In addition, almost three-quarters of the participants ranked hypothetical eye drops as their first or second preferred option, vs. reading glasses, contact lenses, magnifying glasses, and surgery.

Conclusions: This study explored the experience of living with and managing presbyopia and identified limitations and negative impacts of current treatments. Pharmacological development (e.g., eye drops) may fulfill an unmet need in the presbyopia treatment landscape.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Eyeglasses
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Ophthalmic Solutions
  • Presbyopia* / epidemiology
  • Presbyopia* / therapy
  • Quality of Life
  • Visual Acuity

Substances

  • Ophthalmic Solutions