Assessment of low-dose paranasal sinus CT imaging using a new deep learning image reconstruction technique in children compared to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction V (ASiR-V)

BMC Med Imaging. 2022 Jun 3;22(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12880-022-00834-1.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the effects of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction V (ASiR-V) on image quality in low-dose computed tomography (CT) of paranasal sinuses in children.

Methods: Low-dose CT scans of the paranasal sinuses in 25 pediatric patients were retrospectively evaluated. The raw data were reconstructed with three levels of DLIR (high, H; medium, M; and low, L), filtered back projection (FBP), and ASiR-V (30% and 50%). Image noise was measured in both soft tissue and bone windows, and the signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of the images were calculated. Subjective image quality at the ethmoid sinus and nasal cavity levels of the six groups of reconstructed images was assessed by two doctors using a five-point Likert scale in a double-blind manner.

Results: The patients' mean dose-length product and effective dose were 36.65 ± 2.44 mGy·cm and 0.17 ± 0.03 mSv, respectively. (1) Objective evaluation: 1. Soft tissue window: The difference among groups in each parameter was significant (P < 0.05). Pairwise comparisons showed that the H group' s parameters were significantly better (P < 0.05) than those of the 50% post-ASiR-V group. 2. Bone window: No significant between-group differences were found in the noise of the petrous portion of the temporal bone or its SNR or in the noise of the pterygoid processes of the sphenoids or their SNRs (P > 0.05). Significant differences were observed in the background noise and CNR (P < 0.05). As the DLIR intensity increased, image noise decreased and the CNR improved. The H group exhibited the best image quality. (2) Subjective evaluation: Scores for images of the ethmoid sinuses were not significantly different among groups (P > 0.05). Scores for images of the nasal cavity were significantly different among groups (P < 0.05) and were ranked in descending order as follows: H, M, L, 50% post-ASiR-V, 30% post-ASiR-V, and FBP.

Conclusion: DLIR was superior to FBP and post-ASiR-V in low-dose CT scans of pediatric paranasal sinuses. At high intensity (H), DLIR provided the best reconstruction effects.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Children; Deep learning; Iterative reconstruction; Paranasal sinuses; Radiation reduction.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Algorithms
  • Child
  • Deep Learning*
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Humans
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
  • Paranasal Sinuses* / diagnostic imaging
  • Radiation Dosage
  • Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / methods
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed / methods