Automatic Detection of Meniscus Tears Using Backbone Convolutional Neural Networks on Knee MRI

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2023 Mar;57(3):740-749. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28284. Epub 2022 Jun 1.

Abstract

Background: Timely diagnosis of meniscus injuries is key for preventing knee joint dysfunction and improving patient outcomes because it decreases morbidity and facilitates treatment planning.

Purpose: To train and evaluate a deep learning model for automated detection of meniscus tears on knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Study type: Bicentric retrospective study.

Subjects: In total, 584 knee MRI studies, divided among training (n = 234), testing (n = 200), and external validation (n = 150) data sets, were used in this study. The public data set MRNet was used as a second external validation data set to evaluate the performance of the model.

Sequence: A 3 T, coronal, and sagittal images from T1-weighted proton density (PD) fast spin-echo (FSE) with fat saturation and T2-weighted FSE with fat saturation sequences.

Assessment: The detection system for meniscus tear was based on the improved YOLOv4 model with Darknet-53 as the backbone. The performance of the model was also compared with that of three radiologists of varying levels of experience. The determination of the presence of a meniscus tear from surgery reports was used as the ground truth for the images.

Statistical tests: Sensitivity, specificity, prevalence, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, and receiver operating characteristic curve were used to evaluate the performance of the detection model. Two-way analysis of variance, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and Tukey's multiple tests were used to evaluate differences in performance between the model and radiologists.

Results: The overall accuracies for detecting meniscus tears using our model on the internal testing, internal validation, and external validation data sets were 95.4%, 95.8%, and 78.8%, respectively. One radiologist had significantly lower performance than our model in detecting meniscal tears (accuracy: 0.9025 ± 0.093 vs. 0.9580 ± 0.025).

Data conclusion: The proposed model had high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detecting meniscus tears on knee MRIs.

Evidence level: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Keywords: Darknet53; YOLOv4; knee MR image; meniscus tear; object detection.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Arthroscopy
  • Humans
  • Knee Joint / pathology
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods
  • Menisci, Tibial
  • Meniscus*
  • Neural Networks, Computer
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Tibial Meniscus Injuries* / diagnostic imaging
  • Tibial Meniscus Injuries* / pathology