Infrahyoid myocutaneous flap in head and neck reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Oct;51(10):1279-1288. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2022.04.012. Epub 2022 May 19.

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to analyse the literature on the infrahyoid myocutaneous flap (IHMCF) and evaluate its clinical outcomes. The MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases were searched (inception to December 31, 2021). Meta-analyses were then conducted to estimate the overall rates of partial flap loss, total flap loss, salivary fistula, and surgical revision. The 21 studies that met the inclusion criteria included 768 patients undergoing head and neck reconstruction with 773 IHMCF. The oral cavity (77.7%) and oropharynx (13.0%) were the most reconstructed sites. The meta-analyses estimated a pooled partial flap loss rate of 10.4% (99% confidence interval (CI) 5.4-16.7%), total loss rate of 1.8% (99% CI 0.8-3.2%), salivary fistula rate of 3.0% (99% CI 1.3-5.3%), and surgical revision rate of 1.9% (99% CI 0.7-3.7%). Fast flap harvesting and low donor site morbidity were other flap features. Previous thyroid surgery or neck dissection and advanced lymph nodal stage were considered contraindications to IHMCF reconstruction by most authors, while prior neck radiotherapy was reported as a relative contraindication. This pedicled cervical flap is a versatile and reliable reconstructive option for medium-sized head and neck defects. Careful preoperative assessment of the neck condition allows for its safe use.

Keywords: Head and neck cancer; Meta-analysis; Myocutaneous flap; Reconstructive surgery; Regional flaps.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Head and Neck Neoplasms* / surgery
  • Humans
  • Myocutaneous Flap*
  • Neck Dissection
  • Plastic Surgery Procedures*
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Retrospective Studies