Reply to: "Research on agroforestry systems and biodiversity conservation: what can we conclude so far and what should we improve?" by Boinot et al. 2022

BMC Ecol Evol. 2022 May 18;22(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12862-022-02016-7.

Abstract

In our article 'European agroforestry has no unequivocal effect on biodiversity: a time-cumulative meta-analysis' (BMC Ecology and Evolution, 2021) we synthesize the effect of agroforestry on biodiversity. Boinot et al. (BMC Ecology and Evolution, 2022) criticise our approach arguing that our definitions of agroforestry and biodiversity are too narrow; that we use inappropriate control sites for primary studies lacking distance to the treatment sites; that there are too few studies for a meta-analysis in silvoarable systems; and that local practice should be emphasized. We agree on the importance of local practices and that more studies would improve the robustness of our meta-analytical results. However, our conclusions are robust to removing studies criticised for inappropriate controls. We also recognize the problem of different definitions of agroforestry and using species richness as sole proxy for biodiversity. We appreciate being given the opportunity to clarify our results and to trigger future discussions about definitions and the interpretation of results from meta-analysis.

Keywords: External validity; Internal validity; Silvoarable; Silvopasture; Species richness.

Publication types

  • Letter
  • Meta-Analysis
  • Comment