Development and Validation of a Food and Nutrition Literacy Questionnaire for Chinese Adults

Nutrients. 2022 May 5;14(9):1933. doi: 10.3390/nu14091933.

Abstract

The purpose of this study aimed to develop and validate the Food and Nutrition Literacy Questionnaire for Chinese adults (FNLQ). The dimensions and core components of Food and Nutrition Literacy were constructed though literature review and qualitative consensus study. A cross-sectional survey of 8510 participants was conducted. The reliability of the questionnaire was determined by internal consistency, the construct validity was assessed by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and the content validity was assessed by the Pearson correlation coefficient. From the literature review and qualitative methods, 20 core components and 50 questions of the FNLQ were developed, including 1 dimension of knowledge and 3 practice dimensions (ability of selection, preparing food and eating). The overall FNLQ questionnaire had good reliability and validity (Cronbach’s α = 0.893, χ2/DF = 4.750, RMSEA = 0.048, GFI = 0.891 and AGFI = 0.876). The average FNLQ score of all participants was (64.08 ± 12.77), and the score for the knowledge and understanding dimension was higher than that for the practice dimensions. In addition, 80 was set as the nutritional literacy threshold, and only 12.2% met this threshold in this survey. Sociodemographic and health status characteristics were predictors of FNLQ (R2 = 0.287, F = 244.132, p < 0.01). In conclusion, the FNLQ built in this study had good validity and reliability. It could be considered as a reliable tool to assess Food and Nutrition Literacy of Chinese adults.

Keywords: Chinese adults; food and nutrition literacy; questionnaire development; validation.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • China
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Health Literacy*
  • Humans
  • Psychometrics
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Grants and funding

This research was funded by the United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund (Grant number: 2300096295). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.