Callus distraction for brachymetatarsia - A comparison between an internal device and the external fixator

Foot Ankle Surg. 2022 Dec;28(8):1220-1228. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2022.04.001. Epub 2022 Apr 22.

Abstract

Background: Symptomatic patients with severe brachymetatarsia are commonly treated with callus distraction using external mini-fixator (EF) or internal device (ID). This study points out advantages and limitations of both methods comparing clinical and radiographical parameters.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of 21 metatarsal bones in twelve patients. Twelve metatarsals were treated with ID (Genos Mini), nine with EF (MiniRail).

Results: Mean lengthening distance was 17.3 mm using EF and 11.7 mm using ID (p = 0.016). Adverse results were observed in 89% of metatarsals treated with EF and in 33% treated with ID (p = 0.011). Postoperative surgical intervention was required in 33% using EF compared to 0% using ID (p = 0.031). Mean total German Foot Function Index (FFI-T) improved from 49 to 33 using EF and from 47 to 22 using ID (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: CD is a reliable surgical treatment for BMT. Surgeons should be aware of implant-related advantages and complications when counseling patients about treatment options.

Keywords: Brachymetatarsia; Callus distraction; External fixator; Internal distractor; Lengthening.

MeSH terms

  • External Fixators
  • Foot Deformities, Congenital* / surgery
  • Humans
  • Metatarsal Bones* / diagnostic imaging
  • Metatarsal Bones* / surgery
  • Osteogenesis, Distraction* / adverse effects
  • Retrospective Studies