Intervention studies to encourage vaccination using narrative: a systematic scoping review protocol

BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 21;12(4):e053870. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053870.

Abstract

Introduction: Vaccine hesitancy is a global problem, impeding uptake of vaccines against measles, mumps, and rubella and those against human papillomavirus and COVID-19. Effective communication strategy is needed to address vaccine hesitancy. To guide the development of research in the field and the development of effective strategies for vaccine communication, this scoping review aims to analyse studies of interventions using narrative to encourage vaccination.

Methods and analysis: We will search the following databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and PsycARTICLES. We will identify additional literature by searching the reference lists of eligible studies. Eligible studies will be those that quantitatively examined the persuasiveness of narrative to encourage vaccination. Two independent reviewers will screen the titles, abstracts and full texts of all studies identified. Two independent reviewers will share the responsibility for data extraction and verification. Discrepancies will be resolved through consensus. Data such as study characteristics, participant characteristics, methodology, main results and theoretical foundation will be extracted. The findings will be synthesised in a descriptive and a narrative review.

Ethics and dissemination: This work does not warrant any ethical or safety concerns. This scoping review will be presented at a relevant conference and published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Keywords: INFECTIOUS DISEASES; Infection control; PUBLIC HEALTH; Public health.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • COVID-19* / prevention & control
  • Delivery of Health Care
  • Humans
  • Research Design
  • Systematic Reviews as Topic
  • Vaccination
  • Vaccines*

Substances

  • Vaccines