Diabetes Mellitus Is an Independent Risk Factor for a Stiff Left Atrial Physiology After Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Moon-Hyun Kim; Hee Tae Yu; Yoon Jung Park; Tae-Hoon Kim; Boyoung Joung; Moon-Hyoung Lee; Hui-Nam Pak

doi:10.3389/fcvm.2022.828478

Diabetes Mellitus Is an Independent Risk Factor for a Stiff Left Atrial Physiology After Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 28:9:828478. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.828478. eCollection 2022.

Authors

Moon-Hyun Kim¹, Hee Tae Yu¹, Yoon Jung Park¹, Tae-Hoon Kim¹, Boyoung Joung¹, Moon-Hyoung Lee¹, Hui-Nam Pak¹

Affiliation

¹ Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, South Korea.

Abstract

Background: Scar tissue formation after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) may adversely affect the diastolic properties of the left atrium (LA), which can result in a stiff LA physiology in a small proportion of patients. In this study, we aimed to explore the relationship between diabetes mellitus and a stiff LA physiology after AF catheter ablation (AFCA).

Methods: A total of 1,326 patients who underwent de novo AFCA, and baseline and 1-year follow-up echocardiographies were enrolled. After 1:3 propensity score (PS) matching for age, sex, and AF type, we compared 211 patients with DM with 633 patients without DM. A stiff LA physiology was defined as estimated pulmonary arterial pressure increase of >10 mmHg and a right ventricular systolic pressure of >35 mmHg at 1-year follow-up echocardiography. Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) was estimated using echocardiographic parameters.

Results: Among the 844 PS-matched patients, a stiff LA physiology was observed in 32 patients (4.1%). The patients with DM showed a higher peak LA pressure (p < 0.001) and greater LA wall stress (p = 0.001) than did those without. A stiff LA physiology was independently associated with DM [Odds ratio (OR) = 2.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-5.59, p = 0.045], empirical extra-pulmonary vein LA ablation (OR = 3.14, 95% CI 1.07-9.3, p = 0.038) and the ΔPVR (OR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.37-2.31, p < 0.001). The ΔPVR was independently associated with DM (β = 0.37, 95% CI 0.06-0.67, p = 0.020) and a stiff LA physiology (β = 1.40, 95% CI 0.70-2.10, p < 0.001). During the 38.8 ± 29.3months follow-up, the incidence of the clinical recurrence of AF was significantly higher in the patients with a stiff LA physiology than in those without (log rank p = 0.032).

Conclusion: A stiff LA physiology was independently associated with DM because of the relatively small decrease in the PVR after AFCA in this population. The patients with a stiff LA physiology had worse rhythm outcomes after AFCA than those without.

Keywords: atrial fibrillation; catheter ablation; diabetes mellitus; pulmonary vascular resistance; stiff left atrium.