Moral Disengagement, Social Norms, and Motivational Profiles Influence Attitudes Toward Doping Among Spanish Athletics Coaches

Elena García-Grimau; Ricardo De la Vega; Arturo Casado

doi:10.3389/fspor.2022.842959

Moral Disengagement, Social Norms, and Motivational Profiles Influence Attitudes Toward Doping Among Spanish Athletics Coaches

Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Mar 11:4:842959. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.842959. eCollection 2022.

Authors

Elena García-Grimau^{1

2}, Ricardo De la Vega¹, Arturo Casado^{3

4}

Affiliations

¹ Department of Physical Education, Sport and Human Movement, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
² Spanish Agency for Health Protection in Sport, Madrid, Spain.
³ Centre for Sport Studies, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain.
⁴ Faculty of Health Sciences, Isabel I University, Burgos, Spain.

Abstract

Coaches strongly influence athletes' attitudes toward doping and can shape athlete's beliefs, behaviors, and decisions to be for or against doping. Coached-centered studies examining multiple factors affecting coaches' doping attitudes and behavior are scarce. The aim of this study was to analyze for the first-time attitudes toward doping in athletics coaches using the Sport Drug Control Model (SDCM) as a theoretical framework. A secondary aim was to determine the factors in the model predicting attitude and susceptibility toward doping. A cross-sectional study was carried out using a sample consisting of 201 Spanish athletics competitive level coaches from whom 11.4% were female. Participants completed a cross-sectional online survey. Structural equation modeling showed a good fitness of the SDCM. Positive attitudes toward doping predicted high susceptibility to doping (β = 0.39, p < 0.001). Moral disengagement (β = 0.58, p < 0.001), descriptive norms (β = 0.42, p = 0.001), ego-oriented goals (β = 0.34, p < 0.05), and self-efficacy to refrain from doping (β = 0.26, p < 0.05) displayed a significant influence on attitudes toward doping. Self-reported doping prevalence in coaches was 4.5%. These variables should be considered when designing anti-doping research projects and educational programs aiming at modifying coaches' attitudes toward doping. It is recommended to focus more efforts on coaches, without putting aside the athletes, and therefore turn coaches into reliable doping prevention factors. To this end, it is necessary to enhance scientific research and then develop, implement, and promote more educational programs targeting coaches, on a mandatory basis while covering the specific needs of coaches so that they can perform their role as anti-doping educators in an effective, committed, and proactive manner.

Keywords: anti-doping; athlete support personnel; coaches; competitive sport; doping; moral disengagement; motivational profile; social norms.