Sequencing Depth Has a Stronger Effect than DNA Extraction on Soil Bacterial Richness Discovery

Biomolecules. 2022 Feb 25;12(3):364. doi: 10.3390/biom12030364.

Abstract

Although Next-Generation Sequencing techniques have increased our access to the soil microbiome, each step of soil metagenomics presents inherent biases that prevent the accurate definition of the soil microbiome and its ecosystem function. In this study, we compared the effects of DNA extraction and sequencing depth on bacterial richness discovery from two soil samples. Four DNA extraction methods were used, and sequencing duplicates were generated for each DNA sample. The V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was sequenced to determine the taxonomical richness measured by each method at the amplicon sequence variant (ASV) level. Both the overall functional richness and antibiotic resistance gene (ARG) richness were evaluated by metagenomics sequencing. Despite variable DNA extraction methods, sequencing depth had a greater influence on bacterial richness discovery at both the taxonomical and functional levels. Sequencing duplicates from the same sample provided access to different portions of bacterial richness, and this was related to differences in the sequencing depth. Thus, the sequencing depth introduced biases in the comparison of DNA extraction methods. An optimisation of the soil metagenomics workflow is needed in order to sequence at a sufficient and equal depth. This would improve the accuracy of metagenomic comparisons and soil microbiome profiles.

Keywords: DNA extraction; bacterial richness; metagenomics; sequencing depth; soil microbiome.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Bacteria / genetics
  • DNA
  • DNA, Bacterial / genetics
  • High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing / methods
  • Microbiota* / genetics
  • RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / genetics
  • Sequence Analysis, DNA / methods
  • Soil*

Substances

  • DNA, Bacterial
  • RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
  • Soil
  • DNA