The present study aimed to explore the possibility of comprehensively assessing whole-body muscle strength by testing as few muscle groups as possible, using a single testing method (isometric or isokinetic dynamometry) and a single variable (maximal force or rate of force development). Knee, hip, shoulder and elbow extensors and flexors were evaluated in males with high (n = 26) and low strength levels (n = 32). The principal component analysis revealed three factors that explained 62.5% of the total variance, while the main factors were loaded by the different testing methods and strength variables for the muscles acting on the knee (first component), hip (second component) and arm joints (third component). These results were confirmed by a three-way ANOVA which revealed a significant factor of group (P < 0.001) and the interaction test type × group (P = 0.002), but not of test type (P = 0.644), muscle group (P = 0.999), or their interactions (P > 0.205). The correlations of strength outcomes across the muscles ranged from trivial to very large (r range = -0.17, 0.84), being generally higher for the antagonistic muscles. Overall, a comprehensive assessment of whole-body muscle strength can be obtained using isometric dynamometry and maximal force, but it should consider at least one muscle group from the antagonistic pair.
Keywords: Generalisability; isokinetic dynamometry; maximal force; rate of force development; sensitivity.