One-year clinical results of restorations using a novel self-adhesive resin-based bulk-fill restorative

Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 10;12(1):3934. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07965-z.

Abstract

This prospective study assessed the dual-curing self-adhesive bulk-fill restorative Surefil one. The restorations were placed and reviewed by dental practitioners who are members of a practice-based research network in the United States. Seven practitioners filled 60 cavities (20 class I, 19 class II and 21 class V) in 41 patients with Surefil one without adhesive, according to the manufacturer's instructions. The restorations were evaluated using modified USPHS criteria at baseline, 3 months, and 1 year. Patients were also contacted to report postoperative hypersensitivity one to four weeks after placement. The only patient that showed moderate hypersensitivity after 1 year had previously reported symptoms that were unlikely associated to the class I molar restoration. One class II restoration in a fractured maxillary molar was partially lost. The remaining restorations were found to be in clinically acceptable condition resulting in an annual failure rate of 2%. Color match showed the lowest number of acceptable scores (88%) revealing significant changes over time (P = 0.0002). No significant differences were found for the other criteria (P > 0.05). The novel self-adhesive bulk-fill restorative showed clinically acceptable results in stress-bearing class I and II as well as non-retentive class V cavities at 1-year recall.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adhesives
  • Composite Resins
  • Dental Caries*
  • Dental Restoration, Permanent
  • Dentists
  • Humans
  • Professional Role
  • Prospective Studies
  • Resin Cements*
  • Resins, Plant

Substances

  • Adhesives
  • Composite Resins
  • Resin Cements
  • Resins, Plant