Efficacy and Safety of the Sandwich Method in Patients with Benign Prostate Hyperplasia: Bipolar Transurethral Resection with GreenLight Vaporization

Tsu-Chen Lin; Po-Chih Chang; I-Hung Shao; Yu Chen; Hsin-Chieh Huang; Yu-Chao Hsu; Ming-Li Hsieh

doi:10.3390/jcm11051276

Efficacy and Safety of the Sandwich Method in Patients with Benign Prostate Hyperplasia: Bipolar Transurethral Resection with GreenLight Vaporization

J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 26;11(5):1276. doi: 10.3390/jcm11051276.

Authors

Tsu-Chen Lin¹, Po-Chih Chang^{1

2}, I-Hung Shao^{1

2}, Yu Chen^{1

2}, Hsin-Chieh Huang^{1

2}, Yu-Chao Hsu^{1

2}, Ming-Li Hsieh^{1

2}

Affiliations

¹ Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan City 333, Taiwan.
² College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City 333, Taiwan.

Abstract

Benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) refers to the nonmalignant enlargement of the transition zone of the prostate gland. While holmium laser enucleation of the prostate and open simple prostatectomy are effective in the management of patients with large prostates, they have some limitations. Thus, this study aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of the sandwich method of bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (B-TURP) and GreenLight photoselective vaporization of the prostate (GLPVP) in patients with large prostates. Patients diagnosed with BPH who underwent the sandwich method with B-TURP and GLPVP from 2015 to 2020 were included. Efficacy analyses included the change in the uroflowmetry results in both group A (prostate volume < 80 g) and group B (prostate volume ≥ 80 g), and complication analyses included perioperative complications, early postoperative complications at three months and late postoperative complications at 12 months. The cohort comprised 188 and 44 patients in groups A and B, respectively. The prostate volume of groups A and B were 50.83 ± 14.14 g and 102.03 ± 19.36 g (p < 0.001), respectively. The peak (Qmax) and average (Qavg) flow rates were comparable between the two groups. The only significant difference noted was in the postoperative post-void residual (PVR) urine. Improvement was seen in all the variables including the Qmax, Qavg and PVR urine in each group. No patient experienced perioperative complications. Analysis of the overall one-year complication rate showed no significant difference between the two groups. The sandwich method of B-TURP and GLPVP may be feasible for the management of patients with large prostate.

Keywords: GreenLight photoselective vaporization of the prostate; benign prostate hyperplasia; bipolar-transurethral resection of the prostate; large prostate; transurethral surgery of prostate.