Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore and interpret how frontline leaders define, experience and rationalise their approaches to the successful implementation of clinical guidelines in mental health care.
Design/methodology/approach: Employing an interpretative phenomenological design, the authors conducted and analysed individual interviews of frontline leaders at 14 psychiatric clinics involved in a national study of implementing evidence-based clinical guidelines in mental health.
Findings: The authors found a broad spectrum of attitudes and attributes, as well as a wide repertoire of strategies for frontline implementation leadership. Three main approaches were revealed, comprising "Curious and welcoming", "Integrity and setting standards" and "Caring and collegial".
Research limitations/implications: The study present what experienced frontline leaders emphasise to enable implementation of guidelines, not empirical pieces of evidences for what they in fact do or if these actions lead to implementation. The generalisability to other settings is unknown. Another sample profile, context or organisational level may have impacted the result. The concreteness of the frontline leaders' considerations, approaches and actions gives important knowledge about frontline leaders leadership across traditional leadership theories.
Originality/value: Existing leadership theories describe different leadership styles, while this study reveals the need for a wide range of approaches to balance the many needs and demands. The complexity of leadership approaches this study found is in line with implementation theories; thus, the present study incorporates implementation science into the leadership literature.
Keywords: Clinical leadership; Evidence-based practice; Frontline leadership approaches; Implementation management; Implementation resistance; Mental health services.
© Emerald Publishing Limited.