Outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty following failed superior capsular reconstruction

Kevin M Magone; Yaniv Pines; Dan Gordon; Erel Ben-Ari; Young W Kwon; Joseph D Zuckerman; Mandeep S Virk

doi:10.1016/j.jseint.2021.11.019

Outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty following failed superior capsular reconstruction

JSES Int. 2022 Jan 13;6(2):216-220. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.11.019. eCollection 2022 Mar.

Authors

Kevin M Magone¹, Yaniv Pines¹, Dan Gordon¹, Erel Ben-Ari^{1

2}, Young W Kwon¹, Joseph D Zuckerman¹, Mandeep S Virk¹

Affiliations

¹ Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
² Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Tel-Hashomer "Sheba" Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat Gan, Israel.

Abstract

Background: History of prior rotator cuff repair (RCR) may adversely affect the outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), but there is no information regarding the influence of prior superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) surgery on the outcomes of RTSA. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of RTSA following failed arthroscopic SCR.

Methods: All patients who underwent RTSA for failed SCR (SCR cohort) at our institution were identified from our institutional database. A comparative cohort of patients who had RTSA with a history of failed RCR (Control cohort) was also reviewed. Demographic information, 90-day complication rate, 90-day emergency department visits, length of stay, and outcome scores (patient-reported outcomes measurement information system [PROMIS] physical function upper extremity, Visual Analog Scale score, and range of motion) were compared.

Results: From 2015 to 2020, 87 arthroscopic SCRs were performed at our institution and of these, 13 patients underwent RTSA at a mean time of 14.6 months (5.8-32.4) after SCR and were followed up for an average of 17.9 months (1.6-44.6). The average number of shoulder surgeries prior to RTSA was 2.8 (1-7), with the last surgery being SCR. During the same period, we identified 15 patients who underwent an RTSA after a failed RCR (control cohort). The RTSA in the control cohort was performed on average at 12.8 months (1.5-39.5) following the last RCR, and patients were followed up for an average of 27.7 months (2.8-53.9). The average number of shoulder surgeries before the RTSA in the control cohort was 1.4 (1-3). Although the SCR cohort had significant improvements in pain scores and forward flexion (FF), there was only a modest functional improvement with PROMIS scores and no meaningful improvement with external rotation. Complications (23%) in the SCR cohort included 1 periprosthetic joint infection requiring 2-stage revision, 1 acromion stress fracture, and 1 ulnar neuritis. Overall, compared to the SCR cohort, patients in the control cohort had better function (PROMIS physical function upper extremity), lower Visual Analog Scale score, and greater range of motion (FF and external rotation) preoperatively and at last follow-up, but there were no differences in the length of stay and 90-day emergency department visits, infection, and complication rate between the 2 cohorts.

Conclusion: RTSA after failed SCR improves pain and FF but is associated with modest functional improvements and high complication rates. However, these findings will require confirmation in a larger cohort with longer follow-up.

Keywords: Failed rotator cuff repair; Failed superior capsular reconstruction; Irreparable rotator cuff tear; Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; Rotator cuff tear; Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR).