The association between NSM and prognosis of esophageal cancer remains controversial, though several studies have been conducted drawing their own conclusion. Therefore, we firstly carried out this meta-analysis aiming to explore the association. We performed a comprehensive literature search online, including PubMed, Embase and Web of Science. We selected deaths at 5 years and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% (CI) to perform the meta-analysis with Review Manager 5.3, predicting value of clinic-pathological features in NSM also been analyzed. A total of 7 studies were finally enrolled in this study. NSM, defined by either JSED criterion or anatomical compartment criterion, neither showed significant prognostic value on OS of esophageal cancer (P = 0.64), (P = 0.24). Subgroup analysis of JSED criterion, NSM was not a prognostic factor in solitary node metastasis patients (P = 0.39), whereas NSM demonstrated a poor prognostic factor (P = 0.01) for ESCC. Subgroup analysis according to anatomical criterion, NSM was a favorable factor for OS in middle thoracic ESCC (P = 0.003). Pathological N1 status was found to be a risk factor for NSM (P < 0.00001) according to JSED criterion and middle thoracic ESCC was identified as a predictor for NSM (P = 0.0003) according to anatomical compartment criterion. According to JSED criterion, NSM demonstrated poor prognosis on ESCC and N1 status was a risk factor for NSM. Concerning the anatomical compartment criterion, a favorable prognosis of NSM was found in middle thoracic ESCC and NSM was prone to occur in middle thoracic ESCC. CRD42021219333.
Keywords: Esophageal cancer; Node skip metastasis; Prognosis; Risk factors; Surgery.
Copyright © 2022 Asian Surgical Association and Taiwan Robotic Surgery Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.