Transportability and Implementation Challenges of Early Warning Scores for Septic Shock in the ICU: A Perspective on the TREWScore

Michael S A Niemantsverdriet; Meri R J Varkila; Jacqueline L P Vromen-Wijsman; Imo E Hoefer; Domenico Bellomo; Martin H van Vliet; Wouter W van Solinge; Olaf L Cremer; Saskia Haitjema

doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.793815

Transportability and Implementation Challenges of Early Warning Scores for Septic Shock in the ICU: A Perspective on the TREWScore

Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 8:8:793815. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.793815. eCollection 2021.

Authors

Michael S A Niemantsverdriet^{1

2}, Meri R J Varkila³, Jacqueline L P Vromen-Wijsman³, Imo E Hoefer¹, Domenico Bellomo², Martin H van Vliet², Wouter W van Solinge¹, Olaf L Cremer³, Saskia Haitjema¹

Affiliations

¹ Central Diagnostic Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
² SkylineDx, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
³ Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Abstract

The increased use of electronic health records (EHRs) has improved the availability of routine care data for medical research. Combined with machine learning techniques this has spurred the development of early warning scores (EWSs) in hospitals worldwide. EWSs are commonly used in the hospital where they have been developed, yet few have been transported to external settings and/or internationally. In this perspective, we describe our experiences in implementing the TREWScore, a septic shock EWS, and the transportability challenges regarding domain, predictors, and clinical outcome we faced. We used data of 53,330 ICU stays from Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-III (MIMIC-III) and 18,013 ICU stays from the University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, including 17,023 (31.9%) and 2,557 (14.2%) cases of sepsis, respectively. The MIMIC-III and UMC populations differed significantly regarding the length of stay (6.9 vs. 9.0 days) and hospital mortality (11.6% vs. 13.6%). We mapped all 54 TREWScore predictors to the UMC database: 31 were readily available, seven required unit conversion, 14 had to be engineered, one predictor required text mining, and one predictor could not be mapped. Lastly, we classified sepsis cases for septic shock using the sepsis-2 criteria. Septic shock populations (UMC 31.3% and MIMIC-III 23.3%) and time to shock events showed significant differences between the two cohorts. In conclusion, we identified challenges to transportability and implementation regarding domain, predictors, and clinical outcome when transporting EWS between hospitals across two continents. These challenges need to be systematically addressed to improve model transportability between centers and unlock the potential clinical utility of EWS.

Keywords: TREWScore; early warning score (EWS); intensive care; sepsis; septic shock.