Compatibility of rapid enteral feeding advances and noninvasive ventilation in preterm infants-An observational study

Pediatr Pulmonol. 2022 May;57(5):1117-1126. doi: 10.1002/ppul.25868. Epub 2022 Mar 9.

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate safety and clinical outcome of rapid enteral feeding advances in preterm infants <1500 g birthweight (BW).

Methods: In this single-center retrospective cohort study, 293 preterm infants born during 2015-2018 were comparatively analyzed before (n = 145) and after (n = 148) the implementation of a rapid enteral feeding protocol with daily milk increments of 20-30 ml/kg of body weight. Major outcome parameters were focused toward pulmonary morbidities and nutritional variables.

Results: Preterm infants in the rapid feeding advancement group were more successfully stabilized on noninvasive ventilation (p < 0.001) never requiring mechanical ventilation. Duration of respiratory support (0.465) and frequency of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) (p = 0.341) and severe BPD (0.273) did not differ between both groups. Furthermore, patients in the rapid feeding group achieved full volume feedings faster (p < 0.001), regained BW earlier (p = 0.009), and displayed significantly improved somatic growth at 36 weeks gestational age (p < 0.001). There was no increased risk for further morbidities of prematurity including feeding intolerance, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), and focal intestinal perforation.

Conclusion: Rapid enteral feeding advancements in preterm infants <1500 g BW are safe and do not impede stabilization on noninvasive ventilation.

Keywords: enteral feeding advancement; noninvasive ventilation; nutrition; very low birthweight infants.

Publication types

  • Observational Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Birth Weight
  • Enteral Nutrition / adverse effects
  • Enterocolitis, Necrotizing* / epidemiology
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Infant, Premature
  • Infant, Very Low Birth Weight
  • Noninvasive Ventilation*
  • Respiration, Artificial / adverse effects
  • Retrospective Studies