Relative changes in brain and kidney biomarkers with Exertional Heat Illness during a cool weather marathon

PLoS One. 2022 Feb 17;17(2):e0263873. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263873. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Background: Medical personnel may find it challenging to distinguish severe Exertional Heat Illness (EHI), with attendant risks of organ-injury and longer-term sequalae, from lesser forms of incapacity associated with strenuous physical exertion. Early evidence for injury at point-of-incapacity could aid the development and application of targeted interventions to improve outcomes. We aimed to investigate whether biomarker surrogates for end-organ damage sampled at point-of-care (POC) could discriminate EHI versus successful marathon performance.

Methods: Eight runners diagnosed as EHI cases upon reception to medical treatment facilities and 30 successful finishers of the same cool weather marathon (ambient temperature 8 rising to 12 ºC) were recruited. Emerging clinical markers associated with injury affecting the brain (neuron specific enolase, NSE; S100 calcium-binding protein B, S100β) and renal system (cystatin C, cysC; kidney-injury molecule-1, KIM-1; neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, NGAL), plus copeptin as a surrogate for fluid-regulatory stress, were sampled in blood upon marathon collapse/completion, as well as beforehand at rest (successful finishers only).

Results: Versus successful finishers, EHI showed significantly higher NSE (10.33 [6.37, 20.00] vs. 3.17 [2.71, 3.92] ug.L-1, P<0.0001), cysC (1.48 [1.10, 1.67] vs. 1.10 [0.95, 1.21] mg.L-1, P = 0.0092) and copeptin (339.4 [77.0, 943] vs. 18.7 [7.1, 67.9] pmol.L-1, P = 0.0050). Discrimination of EHI by ROC (Area-Under-the-Curve) showed performance that was outstanding for NSE (0.97, P<0.0001) and excellent for copeptin (AUC = 0.83, P = 0.0066).

Conclusions: As novel biomarker candidates for EHI outcomes in cool-weather endurance exercise, early elevations in NSE and copeptin provided sufficient discrimination to suggest utility at point-of-incapacity. Further investigation is warranted in patients exposed to greater thermal insult, followed up over a more extended period.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Acute Kidney Injury / diagnosis*
  • Acute Kidney Injury / epidemiology
  • Acute Kidney Injury / metabolism
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Biomarkers / metabolism*
  • Brain Injuries / diagnosis*
  • Brain Injuries / epidemiology
  • Brain Injuries / metabolism
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Cold Temperature*
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Female
  • Heat Stress Disorders / diagnosis*
  • Heat Stress Disorders / epidemiology
  • Heat Stress Disorders / metabolism
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Marathon Running / injuries*
  • Middle Aged
  • Physical Exertion
  • ROC Curve
  • United Kingdom / epidemiology
  • Weather
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Biomarkers

Grants and funding

The sources of funding for the study were (a) direct financial support from the Ministry of Defence to cover assay costs, salaries of involved military personnel, their temporary accommodation if required close to the study site and (b) material hosting by the Brighton marathon medical team, who provided medical tentage in which the study was performed and appropriate screens to protect volunteer dignity while being sampled etc. No formal numbered grant award was made, rather the MoD raised and settled purchase orders e.g. with Affinity Biomarkers, the commercial company that assayed the chemistry reported. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.