Pre-ejection period (PEP) is an index of sympathetic nervous system activity that can be computed from electrocardiogram (ECG) and impedance cardiogram (ICG) signals, but sensitive to speech/motion artifact. We sought to validate an ICG noise removal method, three-stage ensemble-average algorithm (TEA), in data acquired from a clinical trial comparing active versus sham non-invasive vagal nerve stimulation (tcVNS) after standardized speech stress. We first compared TEA's performance versus the standard conventional ensemble-average algorithm (CEA) approach to classify noisy ICG segments. We then analyzed ECG and ICG data to measure PEP and compared group-level differences in stress states with each approach. We evaluated 45 individuals, of whom 23 had post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). We found that the TEA approach identified artifact-corrupted beats with intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.99 compared to expert adjudication. TEA also resulted in higher group-level differences in PEP between stress states than CEA. PEP values were lower in the speech stress (vs. baseline rest) group using both techniques, but the differences were greater using TEA (12.1 ms) than CEA (8.0 ms). PEP differences in groups divided by PTSD status and tcVNS (active vs. sham) were also greater when using the TEA versus CEA method, although the magnitude of the differences was lower. In conclusion, TEA helps to accurately identify noisy ICG beats during speaking stress, and this increased accuracy improves sensitivity to group-level differences in stress states compared to CEA, suggesting greater clinical utility.
Keywords: emotional tasks; impedance cardiography; pre-ejection period; stress state classification; three-stage ensemble average noise removal method; transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation.
© 2022 Society for Psychophysiological Research.