Preoperative Uterine Artery Embolization in Women Undergoing Uterus-Preserving Myomectomy for Extensive Fibroid Disease: A Retrospective Analysis

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine if a long versus short interval between preoperative uterine artery embolization (PUAE) and subsequent myomectomy impact perioperative blood loss and the complication rate in cases of enlarged multi-fibroid uterus.

Design: In cases of an enlarged multi-fibroid uterus, operative myomectomy can lead to heavy blood loss and consequently increases the risk for transfusion and hysterectomy. PUAE can possibly contribute to a reduction of these risks. Our study was designed to determine if a long versus short interval between PUAE and subsequent surgery impacts perioperative blood loss and complication rate.

Participants and methods: PUAE was performed 24 h before the planned myoma enucleation in 21 patients between January 2011 and March 2016 (group 1) or 19 days before the operation in 23 patients from March 2016 to May 2018 (group 2). A comparison was made to a historical sample of 57 patients with large myomas (>10 cm) without PUAE (group 3). Perioperative blood loss, need for postoperative blood transfusion, and postoperative complications were recorded. Subjective improvement of myoma-related symptoms was assessed for each group by a questionnaire.

Results: PUAE was carried out successfully without complications in all patients. Conversion to hysterectomy was not needed in any of the PUAE patients but was necessary in one of the control patients. In the three groups' comparison, there was a significant lower risk for high blood loss (≥500 mL) in group 1 and a lower but not significant lower risk in group 2 compared to group 3 without an embolization preoperatively. Also, a significant lower risk for postoperative blood transfusion for group 1 (OR 0.02; 0.001-0.328; p = 0.01) and 2 (OR 0.02; 0.001-0.277; p = 0.01) compared to group 3 was observed. The postoperative complication risk was lower in group 2 (model 1: OR 0.12; 0.016-0.848; p = 0.03; model 2 OR 0.07; 0.009-0.588; p = 0.01) compared to group 3. In the context of the postoperative questionnaire, 10 of 11 patients in group 1, 12 of 12 patients in group 2, and 31 of 36 patients from the control group reported an improvement of their complaints.

Conclusion: PUAE is beneficial for uterus-preserving removal of myomas from patients with a substantially enlarged uterus. There is a significant reduction of high blood loss (≥500 mL), need for postoperative blood transfusion, and postoperative complications in patients with extensive fibroid disease after PUAE compared to no intervention before myoma enucleation.

Keywords: Fibroids; Leiomyoma; Myomectomy; Preoperative embolization.