Tracking Neural Stem Cells in vivo: Achievements and Limitations

Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2022 Jun;18(5):1774-1788. doi: 10.1007/s12015-022-10333-z. Epub 2022 Feb 5.

Abstract

Neural stem cell (NSC) therapies are developing rapidly and have been proposed as a treatment option for various neurological diseases, such as stroke, Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis. However, monitoring transplanted NSCs, exploring their location and migration, and evaluating their efficacy and safety have all become serious and important issues. Two main problems in tracking NSCs have been noted: labeling them for visibility and imaging them. Direct labeling and reporter gene labeling are the two main methods for labeling stem cells. Magnetic resonance imaging and nuclear imaging, including positron emission tomography, single-photon emission computed tomography, and optical imaging, are the most commonly used imaging techniques. Each has its strengths and weaknesses. Thus, multimodal imaging, which combines two or more imaging methods to complement the advantages and disadvantages of each, has garnered increased attention. Advances in image fusion and nanotechnology, as well as the exploration of new tracers and new imaging modalities have substantially facilitated the development of NSC tracking technology. However, the safety issues related to tracking and long-term tracking of cell viability are still challenges. In this review, we discuss the merits and defects of different labeling and imaging methods, as well as recent advances, challenges and prospects in NSC tracking.

Keywords: Cell therapies; Magnetic resonance imaging; Neural stem cell; Nuclear imaging; Optical imaging; Tracking.

Publication types

  • Review
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Cell Survival
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods
  • Neural Stem Cells*
  • Positron-Emission Tomography
  • Stroke*