Introduction of EGFR-TKI has changed the treatment paradigm for NSCLC patient with activating mutations of EGFR exons 18-21, replacing chemotherapy as standard first line treatment. Given the delays in molecular study results we sometimes face the need to start treatment in very symptomatic patients with high tumor burden. The reason for this retrospective study is to analyze the survival impact of performing an induction cytotoxic therapy until obtaining the molecular profile (EGFR mutation), followed by targeted therapy. This is a retrospective analysis of 31 patients who did upfront chemotherapy (ChT) before switching to EGFR TKI upon the molecular profile result. The calculated survival endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), duration of TKI response and overall survival (OS). All patients were treated with upfront chemotherapy with a median of one cycle (range 1-3) followed by a first generation EGFR-TKI. Median PFS was 13 months (95% CI, 6.6-19.4) and median OS 33 months (95% CI, 11.9-54.0). After first line progression 14 patients were treated with Osimertinib. In this subgroup median OS was 52 months (95% CI, 34.0-69.9). In the multivariable Cox model, only body mass index retained independent prognostic significance for progression-free survival (p = 0.045). Survival outcomes in this cohort are in line with published data regarding first generation EGFR-TKI, both in terms of PFS and OS. Despite the limitations of this study, starting with upfront chemotherapy doesn't seem detrimental in terms of survival outcomes, with the potential advantage of symptomatic control. To our knowledge, this is the first study to address this strategy, which requires further confirmation.
Keywords: EGFR-TKI; Induction chemotherapy; Non-small cell lung cancer; Switch.
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.