Challenges in the hemodynamic management of acute nontraumatic neurological injuries

Curr Opin Crit Care. 2022 Apr 1;28(2):138-144. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000925.

Abstract

Purpose of review: To appraise the evidence from the literature and suggest an integrated hemodynamic approach of early and delayed phases of acute ischemic stroke (AIS), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).

Recent findings: In AIS, the research aims to evaluate the optimal pressure control before, during and after the revascularization, to optimize the perfusion in the ischemic areas, minimizing the risk of hemorrhage or secondary damage to already infarcted areas. In the early phase of SAH, systemic pressure should be controlled to balance the risk of stroke, hypertension-related rebleeding, and maintenance of cerebral perfusion pressure. The late phase aims to minimize the risk of cerebral vasospasm by adapting systemic pressure and volemia to cerebral and systemic physiological hemodynamic targets. In the mild-to-moderate ICH, achieving SAP of less than 140 mmHg and greater than 110 mmHg may be considered as a beneficial target. Caution should be considered in lowering intensively SAP in severe ICH.

Summary: In nontraumatic brain injuries, the hemodynamic management is strictly related to fluctuating physiology of these diseases, needing a strict control of pressure and flow variable to ensure both cerebral and systemic homeostasis.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Brain Injuries* / complications
  • Cerebral Hemorrhage
  • Hemodynamics
  • Humans
  • Ischemic Stroke*
  • Subarachnoid Hemorrhage*
  • Vasospasm, Intracranial*