Introduction: Ultra-thin (diameter: 3 mm) surgical swabs have not been in practical use as it is difficult to manufacture these using the pre-existing methods; therefore, a new technology has been adopted. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficiency of ultra-thin surgical swabs in bench-top and preclinical settings.
Material and methods: We performed liquid particle counter (LPC) test, cotton strength test, shaft bending comparison and surgical vision test for checking the durability of swabs as bench-top investigation, and laparoscopic surgery in a porcine model as preclinical investigation. All tests were compared with conventional 5-mm swabs.
Results: The ultra-thin swabs had fewer eluted particles in the LPC test, endured a 5 kg pulling force in the cotton strength test, their shaft did not break at 100 mm bending in the shaft bend comparison test, and interfered less in the surgical vision test. They were used for manipulating organs with no damage in preclinical investigation.
Conclusions: Three millimeters ultra-thin surgical swabs manufactured with the new manufacturing technology are effective and safe.
Keywords: Laparoscopic surgery; needlescopic surgery; reduced port surgery; surgical swab; thin-diameter instruments.